Pacific Spirit Marine Institute
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Is there a game afoot!
Some scientists are warning that the world needs to prepare for a 4 degree rise in global temperatures. This is the warning Bob Watson, chief scientific adviser to the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs issued August 7, 2008.
Watson thinks there is little doubt that limiting global surface temperatures to 2C above pre-industrial temperatures needs to be the global aim, but without knowing how to limit those temperatures…”we need to be prepared to adapt to 4C.” [rise]
Sir David King, the UK’s former chief scientific adviser thinks…Even with the best efforts made to keep temperatures at just a 2C rise there is a 20% risk that temperatures will rise by 4 degrees.
Moriarty: This is not danger. It is inevitable destruction…
King said, “My own feeling is that if we get a 4 degree rise it is quite possible that we would begin to see a runaway[temperature] increase.”
Prof. Neil Adger, an expert on adaptation to climate change at Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research says, “At 4 degrees we are basically into a different climate regime.” “There is no science on how we are going to adapt to 4 degrees warming. It is actually pretty alarming.”
The game is afoot.
Watson is the ex-chief scientist at the World Bank. Not odd then that he would recommend that the “Uk should take a lead in research on carbon capture and storage (CSS).
The World’s biggest carbon offset market, the CDM, is administered by the World Bank.
Watson figures the UK should launch 10 to 20 CCS pilot projects. Of course he is correct. Carbon needs to be kept from, or at least limited, from the atmosphere. He uses the 1960’s effort to put a man on the moon by the U.S. as an analogy of what can be accomplished in a relatively short time when determination prevails. The U.S. had a singularly myopic mind set toward a manned moon mission.
Why isn’t the same determination being focused on pulling the world off the engorged CO2 teat?
You stand in the way not merely of an individual but of a might organization, the full extent of which, even you, with all your cleverness, have been unable to realize…
The energy industry stands to make over $21 Billion in the next 5 years. The windfall profits coming from emissions trading.
You must stand clear, Mr. Holmes, or be trodden under foot…
According to David Victor, carbon trading analyst at Stanford University, …”under the CDM, there will be no global climate benefit because the polluter that buys the offset avoids the obligation to reduce its own emissions.
Analysts estimate that two thirds, 2/3 of the emission reduction obligations may be met through buying offsets rather than by decarbonising…
The CDM scheme will actually increase the net amount of carbon going into the atmosphere. International Rivers report titled ‘Failed Mechanism’ says that hydro firms will earn millions of dollars by selling ‘fake carbon credits to companies and governments which can use those carbon credits to justify an increase in emissions.
Why oh why doesn’t it make more sense to turn our intellectual capital towards new sources of power rather than watching the hole planet go to hell in a hand basket?
No one will convince me it is easier to find ways to capture, transport and then store the captured pollution than to figure out how not to generate it in the first place.
The whole cap and trade scheme is just that; a scheme.
Even the language is offensive. Scheme. Long associated with crafty and secret plans. One rarely finds scheme not associated with conniving.
Yes, the game is afoot and to quote Moriarty again: This is not danger, it is inevitable destruction. You stand in the way not merely of an individual but of a mighty organization, the full extent of which, even you, with all your cleverness, have been unable to realize…
You must stand clear, Mr. Holmes, or be trodden under foot…
Photo by T.Scott Williams
Petrified wood in Blue Mesa badlands
Labels: CCS, CDM, Carbon Capture, Carbon-credit, Global Warming, U.N., World Bank, carbon-trading market
© 2009, Pacific Spirit Marine Institute.
UK should take the lead in research on carbon capture and storage.
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Merriam Webster’s definition of a flash point is 1: the lowest temperature at which vapors above a volatile combustible substance ignite in air when exposed to flame. 2: a point at which someone or something bursts suddenly into action or being.
If there is a second tinderbox on the planet outside of the Middle East that place has to be the Arctic. Never before has the Arctic held such a high potential for becoming potentially explosive.
A report from Javier Solana and Benita Ferrero-Waldner, two of the EU’s top foreign policy officials warns the Arctic is ripe for “significant potential conflicts’.
In their 7 page report, the two warn, the rapid melting of the polar ice caps is changing the geostrategic dynamics of the region.
In what is being called the ‘Solana Report’ the authors call on the EU to draw up an Arctic Policy “based on the evolving geostrategy of the region, taking into account access to resources and the opening of new trade routes.”
The call for EU policy action isn’t a new one. Nearly 4 years ago to the date, the United Nations Environment Programme stated, the “Arctic’s unique environment and indigenous peoples are under increasing threat from industrial activities and the region is likely to change drastically unless decision-makers in the European Union and ‘elsewhere’ address the challenges seriously.”
Prof. Jacqueline McGlade, EEA,European Environment Agency, Executive Director, pointed out in 2004 that, “Indigenous peoples have managed the Arctic’s resources in a sustainable manner for thousands of years…” “Industrialised countries, including the EU nations are both the main users and the main sources of pollution affecting the region.” Indigenous peoples suffer most of the adverse effects of this exploitation while receiving a relatively small share of the benefits.”
“With the high levels of toxic chemicals in local Inuit peoples, the melting of permafrost and the retreat of glaciers across the region, the Arctic is like an environmental early warning system for the world,” UNEP Executive Director Klaus Toepfer said in 2004.
Nestled in the heart of this tinderbox are the Inuit. While nestled in the warm halls of the U.N. and in the ‘meet and greets’, officials gather in places like Brussels to discuss the topics of volatility, energy and pollutants. But, no one on earth is touched by the cold, harsh facts of what the future holds for the icy, northern most part of the planet like the Inuit.
Labels: Arctic, Climate Change, EEA, EU, Inuit, Solana Report, U.N.
© 2009, Pacific Spirit Marine Institute.
Flash Point; Arctic
